By Pamela Nomzaza (Academic at Regent Business School)
Quick fixes are failing. Businesses invest in short courses and certificates, expecting transformation, yet return to the same problems months later. Pamela Nomzaza, Academic at Regent Business School, argues this cycle reveals a fundamental misunderstanding about what prepares leaders for complexity. In this piece, she makes the case that training teaches “how” whilst academic education asks “why and what next”; and explains why that distinction matters for organisations facing relentless disruption.
The greatest threat to business during periods of disruption is relying on surface-level solutions when depth is required. Markets shift overnight, technologies advance faster than policies can adapt, and global instability reverberates across every sector. Faced with this volatility, many organisations turn to short bursts of training, quick courses, workshops, or technical certifications that promise immediate answers. These interventions have value, but their impact is often fleeting. The reality is that businesses cannot thrive on quick wins alone. Resilience, innovation, and leadership are not built in a weekend; they are cultivated through rigorous study, critical thinking, and the ability to connect learning to long-term practice. This raises a pressing question, are we preparing leaders for the complexity of tomorrow, or merely equipping them to manage the urgency of today?
The Limits of Training
Short courses, certificates, and executive workshops have undeniable value. They allow employees to plug skills gaps quickly, update knowledge, and gain exposure to new tools or regulations. For example, a one-week data analytics course can sharpen technical fluency, while a leadership workshop may provide useful frameworks for managing teams. Yet, the strength of such training is also its weakness: it is transactional. It delivers content, but not necessarily context. It equips for tasks, but not for transformation. Once the course ends, the momentum often fades, leaving participants with isolated techniques that struggle to integrate into broader organisational strategy.
Most importantly, short courses cannot easily cultivate the enduring qualities required of leadership in volatile environments such as critical thinking, strategic foresight, ethical reasoning, and the ability to innovate in ambiguity. These qualities demand time, immersion, and structured reflection, the very qualities embedded in higher education.
Where Insight Begins
Higher education is where training ends, and insight begins. Structured programmes such as postgraduate diplomas, MBAs, or even doctoral studies are not designed to fill a single skills gap, they are designed to rewire the way leaders think, analyse, and act.
At the heart of academic study is critical thinking. Unlike short training sessions that present “answers,” academic programmes train leaders to interrogate assumptions, question evidence, and construct arguments. This intellectual discipline translates directly into business practice, a leader evaluating a new market entry, for instance, can separate noise from signal and design strategies grounded in evidence rather than intuition alone. Equally, higher education nurtures innovation. By engaging with research, case studies, and cross-disciplinary theories, students encounter new ways of framing problems. Consider South Africa’s persistent energy challenges. A short technical course may outline efficiency measures, but an academically trained leader is more likely to connect insights from economics, sustainability, and operations management to reimagine the organisation’s long-term energy strategy.
At the same time, higher education embeds leadership capacity. Academic learning is not passive absorption, it demands participation, debate, and collaboration. These experiences mirror the dynamics of organisational leadership, where decisions are rarely unilateral but forged through dialogue and collective insight.
While training answers “how,” academic education asks “why” and “what next.” That difference is profound and transformative.
Application in Business Practice
The value of academic thinking is not theoretical. Leaders who pursue structured education consistently report that their studies reshape the way they approach daily decisions. Instead of reacting to problems with piecemeal fixes, they begin to apply frameworks that connect short-term actions with long-term outcomes. For example, a supply chain manager studying towards a Master’s degree may approach a logistics disruption differently. Rather than simply rerouting shipments (a short-term fix), they draw on their studies of risk management and financial analysis to redesign the supply chain, balancing resilience with cost efficiency. This is not knowledge sitting on a shelf, it is insight translated into measurable business results.
Similarly, HR directors who have engaged in postgraduate study often return to their organisations with sharper tools for cultural transformation. Instead of introducing generic employee engagement activities, they understand how to embed organisational learning, truly inspire inclusive leadership, and align people strategy with business strategy. These are shifts that cannot be achieved through a weekend workshop.
Resilience and Innovation in Volatile Times
The hallmark of effective leadership in 2025 is not certainty, but adaptability. Global inflationary pressures, climate change, political instability, and rapid digitalisation all create an environment where leaders must constantly pivot. In such conditions, the difference between those who thrive and those who falter often lies in the depth of their thinking.
Academic education equips leaders to withstand volatility by cultivating resilience. This resilience is not just personal grit; it is systemic insight. Leaders trained to see beyond symptoms can design organisations capable of absorbing shocks, whether through diversified supply chains, agile decision-making structures, or sustainable growth strategies. At the same time, higher education fosters bold innovation. By encouraging learners to draw from diverse disciplines, engage in evidence-based problem solving, and test ideas in structured ways, academic study unlocks creativity grounded in rigour. Innovation becomes not just a flash of inspiration, but a disciplined process that can be scaled and sustained.
Applying Academic Rigour to Real Problems
The temptation to rely on short training programmes will always remain, especially when businesses are under pressure to deliver quick wins. But leaders must ask themselves if these quick wins are preparing their organisations for tomorrow’s crises, or merely patching today’s cracks. Higher education is not about accumulating certificates; it is about transforming perspective. For mature students considering career progression, and for HR managers weighing investments in people, the challenge is clear, look beyond the short-term fix. In 2025, resilience and innovation are no longer optional. They are the currency of survival and growth, and they begin not with training, but with insight.
If you’re ready to seek success, explore Regent Business School’s Undergraduate and Postgraduate programmes, short learning programmes and workforce solutions on our website, call +27 31 304 4626 or send an email to training@regent.ac.za. Our programmes equip you to excel by surrounding you with success.
Author Bio: Pamela Nomzaza
Pamela Zama Nomzaza is a Lecturer and Programme Co-ordinator for the Bachelor of Commerce in Supply Chain Management at Regent Business School. An internationally published researcher, her work explores global trade, logistics, procurement, digital transformation and inclusive supply chain strategies. She is widely recognised for her “Daily Dose of Supply Chain” series on LinkedIn, where she translates complex supply chain topics into accessible insights. Pamela is committed to bridging theory and practice through research, teaching and mentorship, with a focus on empowering future business leaders.
X Marks the Spot:
Short courses promise quick wins. But when the crisis hits, will your team have the depth to respond? Pamela Nomzaza from @REGENT_BSchool on why training teaches “how” whilst academic education asks “why and what next” – and why that difference determines who survives disruption 🔗 Read the full piece: [Insert link] #ExecutiveEducation #BusinessResilience #SouthAfrica #SkillsForSuccess
